By Otto Lührs
least subjective impressions as possible about the work on the waterfront Viña:
My comments clearly did not arise in a conformist approach "is what you get "" better than nothing "," at least something "or" better than I had before, "
My criticism based on the assumption that the works for the movement of cyclists, should be addressed at least, if no more, the same seriousness and quality standards in design and construction, which made for motorized vehicles.
Regarding the new section, I have several comments:
1, uncoordinated with the department of Bath and Ornament:
- asphalt frequently wet by watering
- garden hoses crossed diagonally, an obstacle that can easily cause falls
- cars toiletries (such Green wheels) placed on the bike path
- no pruning palm leaves hanging at the height of the face
2 nd design creates unnecessary crossings into and out of parking. Perfectly
the route of the bike path could have been done between the parking and the beach, but the design was repeated the first tranche, which places the bike lane between parking and sidewalk east, leaving no room for cars waiting to leave or enter the parking lot without blocking bike path. This design flaw is what we see Mr Osvaldo Urrutia (Director SECPLAN), the section at the sundial Guns-Museum, who welcomed the comments and said the revised. Not only did not correct the design, but it repeated the error in the new section. Interestingly I think the appropriate authority of a formal explanation for this absurd design, based on technical reasons, if any.
3 the physical implementation of bike lanes (design and construction) SOCIAL suffers from an implementation (promotion and education of best practices to users and pedestrians)
As a result, normal foot traffic, including cars bus, which more than discomfort, should raise concerns about potential accidents will occur at any time.)
4 th movement of "Bicycle mosquitoes" in the bike lane.
The truth is I do not know the current regulations to these devices, but I think infamous see (and hear them and smell them) going through the bike path, and also dangerous
5 º uncoordinated SECPLAN - DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC this approach it as a conclusion to the evidence that is tangible in the daily life of the streets viñamarinos gives the impression that Mr. Osvaldo Arias Urrutia and Alamiro not know. The Traffic Division Viña del Mar, unfortunately at work excludes non-motorized transit. Whose function is the proper use of spaces for movement of persons, however is not fulfilling this role in the way of pedestrians and cyclists, and coastal bike path that is a sign of carelessness (I daresay " negligence ", but Mrs. Mayor jumped up aghast when you use the word ugly the last time we met with her following the EXCLUSION of cyclists in the traffic plan for the work of the extension 4 tracks of salt - Renaissance, remember?)
that for now, Otto
My comments clearly did not arise in a conformist approach "is what you get "" better than nothing "," at least something "or" better than I had before, "
My criticism based on the assumption that the works for the movement of cyclists, should be addressed at least, if no more, the same seriousness and quality standards in design and construction, which made for motorized vehicles.
Regarding the new section, I have several comments:
1, uncoordinated with the department of Bath and Ornament:
- asphalt frequently wet by watering
- garden hoses crossed diagonally, an obstacle that can easily cause falls
- cars toiletries (such Green wheels) placed on the bike path
- no pruning palm leaves hanging at the height of the face
2 nd design creates unnecessary crossings into and out of parking. Perfectly
the route of the bike path could have been done between the parking and the beach, but the design was repeated the first tranche, which places the bike lane between parking and sidewalk east, leaving no room for cars waiting to leave or enter the parking lot without blocking bike path. This design flaw is what we see Mr Osvaldo Urrutia (Director SECPLAN), the section at the sundial Guns-Museum, who welcomed the comments and said the revised. Not only did not correct the design, but it repeated the error in the new section. Interestingly I think the appropriate authority of a formal explanation for this absurd design, based on technical reasons, if any.
3 the physical implementation of bike lanes (design and construction) SOCIAL suffers from an implementation (promotion and education of best practices to users and pedestrians)
As a result, normal foot traffic, including cars bus, which more than discomfort, should raise concerns about potential accidents will occur at any time.)
4 th movement of "Bicycle mosquitoes" in the bike lane.
The truth is I do not know the current regulations to these devices, but I think infamous see (and hear them and smell them) going through the bike path, and also dangerous
5 º uncoordinated SECPLAN - DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC this approach it as a conclusion to the evidence that is tangible in the daily life of the streets viñamarinos gives the impression that Mr. Osvaldo Arias Urrutia and Alamiro not know. The Traffic Division Viña del Mar, unfortunately at work excludes non-motorized transit. Whose function is the proper use of spaces for movement of persons, however is not fulfilling this role in the way of pedestrians and cyclists, and coastal bike path that is a sign of carelessness (I daresay " negligence ", but Mrs. Mayor jumped up aghast when you use the word ugly the last time we met with her following the EXCLUSION of cyclists in the traffic plan for the work of the extension 4 tracks of salt - Renaissance, remember?)
that for now, Otto
0 comments:
Post a Comment